Things are really hotting up this week in the great debate about air transport being the big nasty in terms of pollution and climate change, as well as the social impact of airport expansion.
Firstly, Virgin Airways, of the entrepreneurial Richard Branson type, unleashed its first test flight of a plane using bio-fuel from Heathrow.
The environmental media in the UK was scathing of this first-ever flight: “coconut airways – jet on a flight to nowhere” taunted The Guardian. While Branson hailed the flight from London to Holland as revolutionary, it was revealed that of the 747’s 4 fuel-carrying tanks, 3 were filled with regular fuel, while the 4th had a mixture of 80% regular fuel, and 20% coconut and babassu palm oil.
Branson, as well as getting involved in some interesting plans for commercial space travel, and working with Green Prophet hero Al Gore on a range of environmental technology schemes, is starting to invest the profit from his transport network into bio-fuels research, particularly into algae as a major component.
Friends of the Earth UK and the World Development Movement (WDM) both commended the experiment but said it didn’t go far enough in seriously attempting to reduce emissions in the aviation Industry. Earlier bio-fuels trials in the UK by both bus and train companies were abandoned, due to research and financial restraints.
Back to Heathrow, and anyone who has ever flown there (via British Airways or El Al from Israel) will be aware of the controversy surrounding the new terminal – which is built and shortly to be opened, and the proposed new runway.
People have had compulsory purchase orders upon their land and property in the area, and a river has been diverted. This morning this short film When I Grow Up arrived in my inbox, graphically showing the effect of increased aviation on the children in the area.
I usually do not comment, however I read a few of the comments on The Great Airways Debate: Bio-Fuels and Expansion | Green Prophet.
I actually do have a couple of questions for
you if you tend not to mind. Is it only me or does it appear like
a few of the responses come across as if they are left
by brain dead individuals? 😛 And, if you are posting on additional
sites, I would like to follow you. Would you post a list of all of your public pages like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?
Feel free to surf to my homepage; Describes It
Can I just say what a comfort to discover somebody who really knows
what they’re talking about on the web. You certainly realize how
to bring an issue to light and make it important.
A lot more people have to check this out and understand this
side of the story. I was surprised you are not more popular given that
you certainly have the gift.
Here is my web blog … Hop Over To Here
[…] more on air travel:Does Virgin Galactic Need to Send the Rich to Space?The Great Airways DebateThe New Taxibot by […]
[…] more on air travel: Does Virgin Galactic Need to Send the Rich to Space? The Great Airways Debate The New Taxibot by Airbus AKPC_IDS += […]
[…] remote location means that the 3-4 million annual tourists visiting it usually arrive by airplane – an infamously polluting form of transportation. This will be a unique challenge for the […]
I forgot to mention that this friday, Beijing’s new international airport will open and become the largest airport in the world, after 4 years construction, and 3.65 billion yuan……………thats an awful lot of shekels, and puts our own Ben Gurion airport in the shade!
Richard Branson’s Virgin has a “green fund”, they have a couple of investments in Israeli Companies…… http://www.virgin-fuels.net/