<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prophet of the Week: Poet Laureate Robert Hass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenprophet.com/2008/01/17/95/prophet-of-the-week-poet-laureate-robert-hass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenprophet.com/2008/01/17/95/prophet-of-the-week-poet-laureate-robert-hass/</link>
	<description>Cleantech and Green Living from the Land of the Prophets</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ilana</title>
		<link>http://greenprophet.com/2008/01/17/95/prophet-of-the-week-poet-laureate-robert-hass/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.232.211/~karink/?p=845#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Mark,

I wrote the article in the Jerusalem Post, which is linked in this post.

 I think it's possible to examine the ecological consequences of our actions without necessarily condemning them outright.

 Thanks for reading!

-Ilana</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>I wrote the article in the Jerusalem Post, which is linked in this post.</p>
<p> I think it&#8217;s possible to examine the ecological consequences of our actions without necessarily condemning them outright.</p>
<p> Thanks for reading!</p>
<p>-Ilana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark L. Levinson</title>
		<link>http://greenprophet.com/2008/01/17/95/prophet-of-the-week-poet-laureate-robert-hass/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark L. Levinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.47.232.211/~karink/?p=845#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I read an interview with this fellow in the Jerusalem Post.  He wanted to know if Israel had considered the environmental impact of the high new fence roughly separating pre-1967 Israel from the Palestinian Authority.  The answer is yes-- all along the length of the fence there is lessened mobility of wildlife, in the brief stretches where the fence takes the form of a solid wall there is some interference with airborne pollen, and in the urban air of Israel there are far fewer flying body parts of blown-up citizens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an interview with this fellow in the Jerusalem Post.  He wanted to know if Israel had considered the environmental impact of the high new fence roughly separating pre-1967 Israel from the Palestinian Authority.  The answer is yes&#8211; all along the length of the fence there is lessened mobility of wildlife, in the brief stretches where the fence takes the form of a solid wall there is some interference with airborne pollen, and in the urban air of Israel there are far fewer flying body parts of blown-up citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
